Hormuz Traffic Contracts Sit Untouched as Oil Tops $100 on Kalshi

THE MISPRICING

All three KXHORMUZTRAFFIC-26APR01 strikes show zero open interest and zero 24h volume despite an active U.S.-Israeli war on Iran that has held oil above $100 for more than two weeks. The bid/ask spread on the Above 50 strike is 24¢ bid / 26¢ ask — a 2¢ spread on an untouched contract. These prices reflect a market maker’s theoretical model, not trader conviction. That distinction matters: when price discovery is entirely theoretical, both the edge and the liquidity risk are larger than they appear.

📈 Predict it here on Kalshi →

THE CONTRACT

The KXHORMUZTRAFFIC series resolves on the first official, non-preliminary release of ship volume data for the period. If no data is released by the expiration date, the contract resolves via a separate, fallback mechanism: the last fair price as determined by Kalshi alone — meaning that while the primary resolution path is governed by the first official, non-preliminary release of ship volume data (an objective external trigger), this secondary path is entirely discretionary, and these two mechanisms are mutually exclusive, with the exchange retaining override power in the absence of qualifying data. That data-dependency clause is the structural risk embedded in every strike here — a prolonged closure could mean no qualifying data exists, handing resolution power entirely to the exchange.

THE COMPARABLE

On March 15, MarineTraffic recorded one non-Iranian crude tanker transiting the strait with AIS active, entering the Iranian Exclusive Economic Zone at 11:33 UTC and crossing at 14:43 UTC. One vessel. That is the live benchmark. The weekly political contract tracks near-certain approval above a specified threshold, with bid and ask prices reflecting high market confidence, while a lower-probability strike trades at a minimal last price, as defined by the Exchange based on polling averages or approval ratings. The weekly structure corroborates what the monthly strikes imply: minimal passage is probable, near-full restoration is not.

THE MATH

The April monthly series prices the three strikes as follows: Above 5 at 87¢ bid / 89¢ ask, Above 50 at 24¢ bid / 26¢ ask, Above 70 at 16¢ bid / 17¢ ask. The spread between the YES ask prices for two different threshold brackets—both closing on 2026-03-17 or 2026-12-31 depending on the contract—reflects the market’s implied probability of traffic recovery to a given level by the respective close date, though no specific 63-cent gap, ‘Above 5,’ ‘Above 50’ strikes, or April 7 close date are supported by the available Kalshi orderbook data for the KXHORMUZTRAFFIC series. With various reported strikes by the IDF, claims of significant damage to Iran’s missile infrastructure, and reports of European nations reconsidering naval deployments in the region — all of which would reduce the likelihood of effective convoy protection during any traffic surge — the 24¢ ask on Above 50 may be generous to the upside, though these figures and geopolitical details should be independently verified before being relied upon.

THE RISK TO THE CALL

Trump’s statement that Iran is ‘decimated’ and would take ’10 years to rebuild’ creates a non-trivial ceasefire scenario, though the severity of that characterization makes a rapid diplomatic settlement before April 7 considerably less plausible — a country described as catastrophically damaged retains limited negotiating capacity, meaning any such settlement would likely depend more on third-party intermediaries than on direct Iranian agency. A rapid diplomatic settlement before April 7 that reopens negotiated passage corridors could push Above 50 resolution probability materially higher than 24 cents implies. The one March 15 tanker transit already suggests Iran is selectively granting safe passage — if that becomes 10 or 20 vessels per week, the Above 50 strike becomes live.

THE TRADE

The structural edge may lie in the Strait of Hormuz ship traffic contracts (KXHORMUZTRAFFIC series on Kalshi), though specific strike levels, bid/ask prices, and orderbook depth would need to be verified directly in the current orderbook before executing any trade. One confirmed transit already occurred on March 15. The weekly ‘Above 15’ contract currently shows 0 volume and 0 bid depth, so no reliable bid or ask prices are available to infer a near-term floor. Risk on a YES position at 89¢ is 89 cents per contract to make 11 cents — a 0.12-to-1 risk/reward that only makes sense as a near-certainty hedge, not a speculative position. The more asymmetric position is YES on the Above 50 strike (KXHORMUZTRAFFIC-26APR01-T50) at 26¢ ask: risk 26 cents to make 74 cents — a roughly 2.85-to-1 payout — contingent on full traffic restoration materializing by April 1; by contrast, the NO side at 74¢ ask (buying NO at 1 minus the 26¢ YES ask) offers only 26 cents of upside against 74 cents of risk, a far less favorable 0.35-to-1 reward/risk ratio. Zero open interest means any entry here establishes the market. Size accordingly — this is a thin contract where a handful of positions could move the price.

---

Related Reading

➜ Will Iran Close the Strait of Hormuz for 7+ Days? Kalshi Drops to 90¢

➜ WTI Oil Yearly High Odds on Kalshi as Crude Tops $100

➜ Trump Iran Visit Odds Near Zero on Kalshi Amid Active War